Leiden Madtrics

  • Home
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Search this site
COVID-19 research in the news: Visualizing the sentiment and topics in science news about the pandemic

COVID-19 research in the news: Visualizing the sentiment and topics in science news about the pandemic

Every day news outlets around the world play a central role in disseminating the latest COVID-19 research. In this post, we discuss the impact of COVID-19 findings on the news by applying state-of-the-art sentiment analysis and present some interesting preliminary results, stay tuned!

Márcia R. Ferreira, Bijan Ranjbar-Sahraei and Rodrigo Costas • July 06, 2020

From ‘fund and forget’ to formative and participatory research evaluation

From ‘fund and forget’ to formative and participatory research evaluation

A trend in research evaluation is to include stakeholders as active partners in the evaluation process. In June, CWTS organized an online workshop to explore novel evaluation approaches and to identify possibilities and limitations for co-production in research evaluation.

Rinze Benedictus, Laurens Hessels, Ismael Ràfols and Ingeborg Meijer • July 03, 2020

Why openly available abstracts are important — overview of the current state of affairs

Why openly available abstracts are important — overview of the current state of affairs

Openness of the metadata of scientific articles is increasingly being discussed. In this blog post, Aaron Tay (SMU Libraries, Singapore Management University), Bianca Kramer (Utrecht University Library), and Ludo Waltman (CWTS, Leiden University) discuss the value of openly available abstracts.

Aaron Tay, Bianca Kramer and Ludo Waltman • June 30, 2020

Evaluative Inquiry I: Academic value is more than performance

Evaluative Inquiry I: Academic value is more than performance

Mainstream evaluation metrics tend to understand academic value as performance while missing other valuable elements of academic value trajectories. This first of four blogposts focuses on the concept of value of the Evaluative Inquiry’s approach to research evaluation.

Tjitske Holtrop, Laurens Hessels and Ad Prins • June 25, 2020

Monitoring the dissemination of COVID-19-related scientific publications in online media

Monitoring the dissemination of COVID-19-related scientific publications in online media

Research around COVID-19 has experienced broad public interest, with new findings being distributed in various communication platforms. In this blog post we introduce a monitoring tool for exploring the social media reception of scientific publications on the pandemic.

Rodrigo Costas, Giovanni Colavizza, Jonathan Dudek and Zhichao Fang • June 23, 2020

You couldn't attend the Altmetrics conference? Fear not! We recorded everything you missed

You couldn't attend the Altmetrics conference? Fear not! We recorded everything you missed

Our generous friends at TIB have created a service to watch all the Altmetrics conference and workshop videos. We are so lucky!

Bastian Drees, Grischa Fraumann and Isabella Peters • June 09, 2020

How does a lockdown affect a visiting researcher? Some reflections during the COVID-19 lockdown period

How does a lockdown affect a visiting researcher? Some reflections during the COVID-19 lockdown period

In July 2019, I joined CWTS for a one-year research stay. The lockdown due to COVID-19 changed my situation as a visiting researcher quite a bit. While virtual ways of working could make up for some of the constraints experienced, I had to think: what might be the effects on academic networking?

Carey Ming-Li Chen • June 05, 2020

Exploring the COVID-19 discourse in “The Conversation”

Exploring the COVID-19 discourse in “The Conversation”

The current pandemic has revealed a pressing demand for accessible and reliable science communication. Platforms such as “The Conversation” can help by enabling experts to communicate research to the public. Here, we explore the topics that became prevalent in this medium in the context of COVID-19.

Jonathan Dudek and Rodrigo Costas • June 02, 2020

Comparing bibliographic data sources: Q&A

Comparing bibliographic data sources: Q&A

Last week CWTS researchers Martijn Visser, Nees Jan van Eck, and Ludo Waltman published the paper 'Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic'. In this post, the authors answer ten questions about their work.

Martijn Visser, Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman • May 29, 2020

  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12

Contributors

  • Martijn Visser

    Martijn Visser

    Researcher

  • Nees Jan van Eck

    Nees Jan van Eck

    Senior Researcher & Head of ICT

  • Ed Noyons

    Ed Noyons

    Senior researcher

    Deputy Director

  • Carey Ming-Li Chen

    Carey Ming-Li Chen

    Visiting researcher

  • Bianca Kramer

    Bianca Kramer

    Information/Collection Specialist

All contributors >

Categories

  • Science & Society
  • How-to
  • CWTS development
  • Opinion & Commentary
  • Summary & Review
  • Long read
  • Resources
  • Book Review

Tags

  • R&I
  • Area-based connectedness
  • literature
  • online research retreat
  • heterogen
  • Research Assessment Comittee
  • Acknowledgements
  • learning

All tags >

Stay Connected

Info

  • Disclaimer
  • Contact us
  • Subscribe to our newsletter