Scholarly communication as a collective responsibility CWTS has developed a Scholarly Communication Policy that treats publishing as a collective responsibility rather than an individual choice. In this blog post, we introduce the policy, reflect on its co-creation, and invite other institutions to consider adopting a similar approach. Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Andrew S. Hoffman and Ludo Waltman • July 14, 2026
In memoriam Caroline S. Wagner Caroline S. Wagner (1955-2026) was a highly regarded scholar in the field of science and technology policy. Paul Wouters reflects on her impressive contributions to research on science policy, the globalization of research, international collaboration, and scientometrics. Paul Wouters • July 09, 2026
Research culture as a politics of uncertainty As research culture increasingly becomes an object of governance, it also raises important conceptual questions. Based on a pitch at the Research Cultures in Transition Roundtable (STS NL 2026, University of Twente), this post proposes one way to give the concept greater analytical substance. Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner • July 07, 2026
Engaging with societal challenges through diverse knowledge systems How can we foster diverse and inclusive knowledge systems that genuinely engage with societal needs and challenges? This question lies at the heart of the new strategy of the CWTS Focal Area Engagement & Inclusion for 2026-2028. Engagement & Inclusion • June 03, 2026
The mosaic of science: When does disciplinary diversity translate into prestige? Scientific collaboration across disciplines resembles a mosaic, with each piece contributing to a composition more coherent than any fragment on its own. This diversity is widely seen as necessary for tackling complex problems. But does it also translate into scientific prestige? Julián D. Cortés • May 28, 2026
Universities must act now to regulate AI-use in science Dutch universities need to quickly establish standards or guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in research. Currently, individual researchers carry too much responsibility. What do integrity, reliability, and independence mean when using AI, and how can we safeguard these values? Laurens Hessels • May 21, 2026
Advancing open research information: The next three years of the Information & Openness focal area Today we published the 2026-2028 strategic plan for the Information & Openness focal area. This blogpost provides an overview of the plan, describing our vision and objectives for advancing the uptake of open research information in the coming years. Information & Openness • April 28, 2026
Developing an Open Science Readiness Assessment Framework for the SEP Developing long-term OS policies and roadmaps can be a daunting task for research units. This blog post proposes to develop an Open Science Readiness Assessment Framework tool, aligned with the Dutch Strategy Evaluation Protocol to help research units to better embed OS in their long-term planning. Louise Bezuidenhout • April 14, 2026
Insular policy feedback: Why reforming metrics alone may not be enough Metric-driven research systems persist because governance structures often matter more than metrics themselves. Eleonora Dagiene, Ludo Waltman, Guus Dix and Vincent Larivière • April 09, 2026 • 1 comment
